Skip to content

Taxonomic Paper Returned roperi and martensi to Subspecies of the Flap-Necked Chameleon

Female flap-necked chameleon perched on branches in iSimangaliso Wetland Park

A taxonomic paper published on 13 April 2026 revisited recent changes proposed within the flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis) species complex. Writing in African Journal of Herpetology, Devon C. Main and Colin R. Tilbury questioned the validity of a newly proposed species, Chamaeleo incognitus, and formally returned C. roperi and C. martensi from species rank to subspecies of C. dilepis.

The paper responds to a 2025 publication that described C. incognitus from the Kenyan highlands, primarily using morphology and elevational distribution. Main and Tilbury argue that the proposed name is currently unavailable under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. In zoological nomenclature, an “available” name is one that has been formally established under the Code’s rules. For electronic publications, the work must be registered in ZooBank before publication; the authors point out that the 2025 paper was registered only afterwards.

The proposed species name was challenged on both nomenclatural and biological grounds

They also challenge the biological evidence used to separate the proposed species. The authors state that morphology alone is unreliable for distinguishing species within the Chamaeleo dilepis complex and that previously published phylogenetic data do not support the boundaries proposed for C. incognitus. In their assessment, the combination of morphological differences and highland occurrence is not sufficient evidence for recognising it as a separate species.

roperi and martensi were returned to subspecies rank

The same paper addresses Chamaeleo roperi and Chamaeleo martensi, two forms that had recently been treated as full species. Main and Tilbury argue that the available evidence does not justify species rank and formally treat them instead as Chamaeleo dilepis roperi and Chamaeleo dilepis martensi.

The paper highlights a broader difficulty in the flap-necked chameleon complex: geographically separated populations can differ in appearance, but morphological variation does not necessarily map neatly onto independently evolving lineages. The authors therefore emphasise phylogenetic evidence alongside morphology when deciding where species boundaries should be drawn in this group.

About this content: This story was produced with AI assistance within an editorial workflow developed by Wildlife Vagabond. Editorial responsibility remains with Wildlife Vagabond.How AI is used

Evolution & taxonomy

SPECIES IN THIS STORY

Species in this story

Flap-necked Chameleon Chamaeleo dilepis Explore species

Independent research and conservation news archive

Did you find this information useful?

Wildlife Vagabond is independently built and maintained. Voluntary support helps cover source verification, hosting and continued work on research and conservation news.

Support Wildlife Vagabond

The news archive will remain freely available.